Institutional Methodology (IM)

"Institutional Methodology (IM)" submitted by SchoolGrantsfor Editorial Team and last updated on Monday 9th January 2012

The term "demonstrated financial need" is typically used to describe an assessment based on Institutional Methodology for undergraduate need-based, institutional funding. The amount that an applicant can be expected to contribute is measured according to standardized formulas. These standardized formulas include the federal and institutional methodologies, and the 568 Consensus Approach.

Federal VS Institutional Methodologies:

The FAFSA provides all the student information necessary to receive federal Pell Grants, federal student loans, and federal campus-based aid. However, some schools collect additional information before awarding their own funds, i.e., institutional student aid. In many cases, colleges and universities use a commercially available supplemental form. This and similar systems are known as institutional methodology (IM), to distinguish them from federal methodology.

Institutional Methodology (IM) is the College Board's need-analysis system. Developed by financial aid practitioners and economists, IM provides a comprehensive evaluation of a family's ability to pay for the costs of higher education. Over 600 institutions use IM in conjunction with the CSS/Financial Aid PROFILE to target their need-based funds equitably to the most deserving students.

Choose "Federal Methodology" to calculate your expected family contribution (EFC) and financial need using the Federal Need Analysis Methodology used by the Federal processor and school financial aid administrators. Choose "Institutional Methodology" to get an estimate of your financial need using a formula similar to the one used by many private colleges and universities. IM is instrumental in figuring how the institution will use its own monies (not Federal funds) regarding financial aid for said family.

Not all schools use institutional methodology (IM) to determine eligibility for financial aid. The majority of colleges and universities in this country use only federal methodology (FM). Even within those schools that use IM, there are differences in how institutions use information gathered on the CSS PROFILE. There are also variances in the financial resources that institutions can draw upon when awarding gift aid.

A family's contribution is not something most families can realistically take out of one year's income, and most families finance their share of college costs through a combination of saving, paying out of current income, and borrowing.

In other words, it is a system designed to squeeze even more money from a family with a college-bound or an upper-class student. The logic is simple, it's our money (the schools) and we will hand it out in a manner we seem to befit the individual family's financial aspects. The Federal methodology system (FM) apparently isn't enough for private schools: They wish to extract even more money from the family using the Institutional Methodology system. In reality it is double assessment from two systems that are miles apart in many similar aspects: Essentially it is having your income taxed twice; once by the state, and then by the federal government.

Institutional Methodology (IM) provides:

Comments Post new comment